Triple
T4095340
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mississippi Department of Health in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization |
E87801
|
entity |
| Predicate | argumentBasis |
P23142
|
FINISHED |
| Object | state sovereignty over abortion regulation |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: state sovereignty over abortion regulation | Statement: [Mississippi Department of Health in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, argumentBasis, state sovereignty over abortion regulation]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: argumentBasis Context triple: [Mississippi Department of Health in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, argumentBasis, state sovereignty over abortion regulation]
-
A.
arguesThat
Indicates that one entity presents reasons or justification in support of a specific claim, position, or proposition held about another entity or topic.
-
B.
decisionBasis
chosen
Indicates the underlying reason, criterion, or rationale on which a decision is made.
-
C.
defenseArgument
Indicates that an entity presents or supports a line of reasoning intended to defend or justify another entity, often in a legal or argumentative context.
-
D.
arguedUnder
Indicates that one entity presented arguments or conducted a legal case under the supervision, authority, or guidance of another entity (such as a mentor, attorney, or judge).
-
E.
justification
Indicates that one entity provides a reason, explanation, or supporting argument for the existence, validity, or appropriateness of another entity or claim.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69aed94564cc8190a9c1457daedb6e7f |
completed | March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aefcddd76c81909fbf5db1f5d91a14 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 5:01 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aef90b2ef08190ae84febfd69dd48b |
completed | March 9, 2026, 4:44 p.m. |
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:40 p.m.