Triple
T4092256
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lebesgue spaces |
E87728
|
entity |
| Predicate | LpDefinition |
P52979
|
FINISHED |
| Object | p-integrable functions |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: p-integrable functions | Statement: [Lebesgue spaces, LpDefinition, p-integrable functions]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: LpDefinition Context triple: [Lebesgue spaces, LpDefinition, p-integrable functions]
-
A.
pointDefinition
Indicates that one entity serves as the defining description or specification of a particular point in another entity.
-
B.
partlyDefinedBy
Indicates that one entity’s nature, role, or characteristics are only partially determined or specified by another entity.
-
C.
laterDefinedBy
Indicates that the referenced entity’s full definition or specification is provided at a subsequent point in the same or another resource.
-
D.
divisionDefinedBy
Indicates that a division or partition is established or characterized according to a specified rule, criterion, or defining entity.
-
E.
logicalForm
Indicates a relationship where an expression is associated with its structured, formal logical representation.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69aed94425148190be337845d56fac22 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aefcae22a081908af65a960306b78c |
completed | March 9, 2026, 5 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aef909c9c88190b09d48dad325a83c |
completed | March 9, 2026, 4:44 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69aef9b34dec81909bbc3def9decc71a |
completed | March 9, 2026, 4:47 p.m. |
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:40 p.m.