Triple

T4092226
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lebesgue spaces E87728 entity
Predicate equivalenceRelation P6530 FINISHED
Object equality almost everywhere LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: equality almost everywhere | Statement: [Lebesgue spaces, equivalenceRelation, equality almost everywhere]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: equivalenceRelation
Context triple: [Lebesgue spaces, equivalenceRelation, equality almost everywhere]
  • A. equivalentTo chosen
    Indicates that two entities represent the same concept, value, or state, and can be treated as interchangeable in the given context.
  • B. isEquiconsistentWith
    Indicates that two formal theories or systems have the same consistency strength, such that if one is consistent then the other is also consistent, and if one is inconsistent then so is the other.
  • C. valueRelation
    Indicates a comparative or associative relationship between the values or magnitudes of two or more entities.
  • D. isInverseOf
    Indicates that one relation reverses the direction of another, so that if the original relates A to B, its inverse relates B to A.
  • E. relatedTheorem
    Indicates that one theorem is connected to another through a logical, thematic, or derivational relationship.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69aed94425148190be337845d56fac22 completed March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69aefcae22a081908af65a960306b78c completed March 9, 2026, 5 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69aef909c9c88190b09d48dad325a83c completed March 9, 2026, 4:44 p.m.
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:40 p.m.