Triple
T409102
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Antarctic policy of Chile |
E9446
|
entity |
| Predicate | recognizesRegime |
P11066
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Antarctic Treaty System as the governing framework for Antarctica |
E4135
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Antarctic Treaty System as the governing framework for Antarctica | Statement: [Antarctic policy of Chile, recognizesRegime, Antarctic Treaty System as the governing framework for Antarctica]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Antarctic Treaty System as the governing framework for Antarctica Context triple: [Antarctic policy of Chile, recognizesRegime, Antarctic Treaty System as the governing framework for Antarctica]
-
A.
Antarctic Treaty System
chosen
The Antarctic Treaty System is an international legal framework that regulates activities in Antarctica, preserving it for peaceful, scientific use and suspending territorial sovereignty claims.
-
B.
Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty
The Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty is an international agreement that designates Antarctica as a natural reserve devoted to peace and science, imposing strict environmental safeguards and a ban on mineral resource activities.
-
C.
Antarctic Treaty
The Antarctic Treaty is an international agreement that designates Antarctica as a scientific preserve, bans military activity on the continent, and promotes peaceful cooperation and environmental protection among nations.
-
D.
Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources
The Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources is an international agreement that regulates the protection and sustainable use of marine ecosystems in the Southern Ocean surrounding Antarctica.
-
E.
Convention for the Conservation of Antarctic Seals
The Convention for the Conservation of Antarctic Seals is an international environmental agreement that regulates the protection and management of seal populations in the Antarctic region under the broader Antarctic Treaty System.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: recognizesRegime Context triple: [Antarctic policy of Chile, recognizesRegime, Antarctic Treaty System as the governing framework for Antarctica]
-
A.
createdRegimeOf
Indicates that one entity brought about, established, or was responsible for the formation of a particular regime or system of rule for another entity.
-
B.
governmentType
Indicates the form or system of governance under which an entity (such as a country or organization) is organized and ruled.
-
C.
hasNumberOfRecognizedSovereignStates
Indicates the relationship that specifies how many internationally recognized sovereign states are associated with or contained within a given entity.
-
D.
independenceRecognized
Indicates that one entity formally acknowledges another entity’s status as independent and self-governing.
-
E.
countryRuled
Indicates that one entity exercises governing authority or political control over a country.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e80111fc8190961d5b7c6154123f |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:05 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2ecc098c4819088d127c5ea55ced9 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:25 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69a4239ffb5c819091b96dbe38a06d07 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 11:31 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2e971a3a481909e6b075f25dd234a |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:11 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a2ea4545608190898436c72e10f39d |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:14 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:08 p.m.