Triple
T409096
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Antarctic policy of Chile |
E9446
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsInfrastructure |
P11065
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Chilean Antarctic research stations |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Chilean Antarctic research stations | Statement: [Antarctic policy of Chile, supportsInfrastructure, Chilean Antarctic research stations]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsInfrastructure Context triple: [Antarctic policy of Chile, supportsInfrastructure, Chilean Antarctic research stations]
-
A.
usesInfrastructure
Indicates that one entity makes use of, depends on, or operates through the infrastructure provided or managed by another entity.
-
B.
support
Indicates that one entity provides assistance, endorsement, or backing to another entity or its actions.
-
C.
supportBase
Indicates that one entity serves as a foundational or backing structure that physically or functionally supports another entity.
-
D.
hasInfrastructureType
Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a specific category or type of infrastructure.
-
E.
supportsTheory
Indicates that one entity provides evidence, justification, or endorsement for the validity or acceptance of another entity’s theory.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e80111fc8190961d5b7c6154123f |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:05 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2ecc098c4819088d127c5ea55ced9 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:25 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2e971a3a481909e6b075f25dd234a |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:11 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a2ea4545608190898436c72e10f39d |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:14 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:08 p.m.