Triple
T407850
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Magna Graecia |
E9421
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPart |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Poseidonia |
E51792
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Poseidonia | Statement: [Magna Graecia, hasPart, Poseidonia]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Poseidonia Context triple: [Magna Graecia, hasPart, Poseidonia]
-
A.
Piraeus
Piraeus is the main port of Athens and one of the largest and busiest seaports in the Mediterranean, serving as a key hub for Greek and international maritime trade and passenger transport.
-
B.
Locri Epizephyrii
Locri Epizephyrii was an important ancient Greek colony in southern Italy, renowned for its early legal code and cultural influence within Magna Graecia.
-
C.
Morea
Morea was the medieval name for the Peloponnese peninsula in southern Greece, which served as a significant Byzantine province and later despotate.
-
D.
Sybaris
chosen
Sybaris was an ancient Greek city in southern Italy famed for its immense wealth and legendary luxury.
-
E.
Lucania
Lucania was an ancient region of southern Italy inhabited by the Lucani people, corresponding largely to modern Basilicata and parts of Campania and Calabria.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e80111fc8190961d5b7c6154123f |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:05 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2ecbf0650819080753815ca280eec |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:25 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69a42a12e5548190aedc6e18ef24c0ce |
completed | March 1, 2026, 11:59 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:08 p.m.