Triple

T4076762
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Tulu E86782 entity
Predicate isMinorityLanguage P30213 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Tulu, isMinorityLanguage, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isMinorityLanguage
Context triple: [Tulu, isMinorityLanguage, yes]
  • A. isOfficialMinorityLanguageIn
    Indicates that a language has formal, legally recognized minority-language status within a specified political or geographic entity.
  • B. linguisticMinorityStatus
    Indicates that an entity belongs to a group whose primary language is not the dominant or official language of the surrounding society or region.
  • C. linguisticMinorityIn
    Indicates that a group or population constitutes a linguistic minority within a specified geographic or political region.
  • D. isSpokenByMinority chosen
    Indicates that the language or dialect is used primarily by a numerically smaller or less dominant group within a larger population.
  • E. minorityLanguagePolicy
    Indicates a policy or set of rules governing the recognition, protection, and use of languages spoken by minority groups within a larger political or social context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69aed93ebe448190a1f1686e28740ac9 completed March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69aefc4ba3f08190a6c6aaf6e9c99bd5 completed March 9, 2026, 4:58 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69aef9082c2081908474f082a49bebc8 completed March 9, 2026, 4:44 p.m.
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:39 p.m.