Triple
T4059927
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 2003 California gubernatorial recall election |
E84784
|
entity |
| Predicate | recallNoVoteShare |
P53821
|
FINISHED |
| Object | approximately 44.6% |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: approximately 44.6% | Statement: [2003 California gubernatorial recall election, recallNoVoteShare, approximately 44.6%]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: recallNoVoteShare Context triple: [2003 California gubernatorial recall election, recallNoVoteShare, approximately 44.6%]
-
A.
nonVoting
Indicates that an entity participates in a group or organization without possessing the right to vote in its decisions.
-
B.
committedAbstentionFrom
Indicates that an entity has formally pledged or undertaken a deliberate abstention from performing a particular action or engaging in a specified activity.
-
C.
voteAgainst
Indicates that an entity formally expresses opposition to a proposal, decision, or candidate in a voting process.
-
D.
voteRecord
Indicates that an entity has cast a specific vote or holds a particular voting position in a given decision or election.
-
E.
lostFormalVoteOnBudget
Indicates that an entity failed to secure enough support in a formal vote on a budget proposal.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69aed933bec881909edfa28ebb69c634 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aefd0bdea48190805a79515ee92709 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 5:02 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aef90438908190a005b08ba271eacf |
completed | March 9, 2026, 4:44 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69aefd0995188190b1bc8771fe7f423a |
completed | March 9, 2026, 5:02 p.m. |
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:38 p.m.