Triple
T4059926
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 2003 California gubernatorial recall election |
E84784
|
entity |
| Predicate | recallYesVoteShare |
P9216
|
FINISHED |
| Object | approximately 55.4% |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: approximately 55.4% | Statement: [2003 California gubernatorial recall election, recallYesVoteShare, approximately 55.4%]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: recallYesVoteShare Context triple: [2003 California gubernatorial recall election, recallYesVoteShare, approximately 55.4%]
-
A.
yesVotes
Indicates that a specified entity has cast or received affirmative votes in a decision-making or voting context.
-
B.
voteRecord
Indicates that an entity has cast a specific vote or holds a particular voting position in a given decision or election.
-
C.
popularVoteShare
chosen
Indicates the proportion of all votes cast in an election that were received by a particular candidate, party, or option.
-
D.
ratificationVote
Indicates a formal vote taken to approve, confirm, or give official sanction to a decision, agreement, or action.
-
E.
voteCountedIn
Indicates that a particular vote has been included in the official tally for a specific election, contest, or jurisdiction.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69aed933bec881909edfa28ebb69c634 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aefd0bdea48190805a79515ee92709 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 5:02 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aef90438908190a005b08ba271eacf |
completed | March 9, 2026, 4:44 p.m. |
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:38 p.m.