Triple
T4054815
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Human Rights Act 1998 |
E84667
|
entity |
| Predicate | section4Effect |
P1634
|
FINISHED |
| Object | allows higher courts to issue declarations of incompatibility |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: allows higher courts to issue declarations of incompatibility | Statement: [Human Rights Act 1998, section4Effect, allows higher courts to issue declarations of incompatibility]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: section4Effect Context triple: [Human Rights Act 1998, section4Effect, allows higher courts to issue declarations of incompatibility]
-
A.
section4Function
Indicates that an entity serves as, or is associated with, the function or role defined in section 4 of a document, agreement, or specification.
-
B.
sideEffect
Indicates that one entity is an unintended or secondary effect resulting from the use or occurrence of another entity.
-
C.
section5Description
Indicates a descriptive text or explanation specifically associated with section 5 of a document or structured content.
-
D.
primaryEffect
chosen
Indicates the main direct outcome or consequence that results from a given cause, action, or condition.
-
E.
tookEffect
Indicates that a change, rule, condition, or event became active, operative, or started producing its intended consequences.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69aed933bec881909edfa28ebb69c634 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aefbaa84b88190856e179266769e6d |
completed | March 9, 2026, 4:56 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aef90249e4819095e9e043bc4aa9a6 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 4:44 p.m. |
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:38 p.m.