Triple
T4025099
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mazars USA LLP |
E91372
|
entity |
| Predicate | involvedIn |
P149
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Trump v. Vance |
E16270
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Trump v. Vance | Statement: [Mazars USA LLP, involvedIn, Trump v. Vance]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Trump v. Vance Context triple: [Mazars USA LLP, involvedIn, Trump v. Vance]
-
A.
Trump v. Vance
chosen
Trump v. Vance is a 2020 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a sitting president is not absolutely immune from state criminal subpoenas, allowing a New York grand jury to obtain Donald Trump’s financial records.
-
B.
Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP
Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP is a landmark 2020 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed whether congressional committees could subpoena the personal financial records of a sitting president.
-
C.
Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee
Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee is a 2021 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the scope of federal protections against voting discrimination, particularly under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
-
D.
New York v. Trump Foundation civil lawsuit
The New York v. Trump Foundation civil lawsuit was a high-profile case brought by the New York Attorney General accusing Donald Trump’s charitable foundation of persistent legal violations, including self-dealing and misuse of charitable assets, ultimately leading to the foundation’s dissolution and financial penalties.
-
E.
DeBoer v. Snyder
DeBoer v. Snyder was a federal court case challenging Michigan’s same-sex marriage ban that became one of the key cases consolidated into the landmark Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, which legalized same-sex marriage nationwide.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69aed9618b04819081750d979d2af098 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aefacfb23081909a46878adb90ea6c |
completed | March 9, 2026, 4:52 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69b54c84ce9081909ecf3aeee95cb2bf |
completed | March 14, 2026, 11:54 a.m. |
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:35 p.m.