Triple
T4012085
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Supreme Court of New Hampshire |
E90666
|
entity |
| Predicate | opinionsAre |
P29605
|
FINISHED |
| Object | binding precedent on lower New Hampshire courts |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: binding precedent on lower New Hampshire courts | Statement: [Supreme Court of New Hampshire, opinionsAre, binding precedent on lower New Hampshire courts]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: opinionsAre Context triple: [Supreme Court of New Hampshire, opinionsAre, binding precedent on lower New Hampshire courts]
-
A.
opinionBy
Indicates that a particular opinion, viewpoint, or judgment is expressed or held by a specific entity.
-
B.
hasDifferentOpinionsOn
Indicates that two or more entities hold differing views or judgments regarding a particular topic, issue, or subject.
-
C.
givesOpinionOn
Indicates that one entity expresses a view, judgment, or evaluation about another entity or subject.
-
D.
publishedOpinionsAre
chosen
Indicates that certain opinions have been made publicly available or formally released in a published form.
-
E.
notableOpinion
Indicates that one entity holds a significant or widely recognized opinion or viewpoint about another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69aed95e44088190aff7d90a151b1b20 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aefaec08dc8190a341809059554f84 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 4:53 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aef8fa6fec81909b1190ecbba61410 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 4:44 p.m. |
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:34 p.m.