Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Supreme Court of the United States | Statement: [Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985, heldUnconstitutionalInPartBy, Supreme Court of the United States]

Target entity: Supreme Court of the United States
Context triple: [Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985, heldUnconstitutionalInPartBy, Supreme Court of the United States]

• A. Supreme Court of the United States chosen
  The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest federal court in the U.S. judiciary, serving as the final arbiter of constitutional and federal law.
• B. Supreme Court
  The Supreme Court is the highest judicial authority in Puerto Rico, serving as the final arbiter of legal disputes and interpreter of the territory’s constitution and laws.
• C. Supreme Court
  The Supreme Court is the highest court of general jurisdiction in Taiwan’s judicial system, responsible for ensuring the uniform interpretation and application of law.
• D. The Supreme Court
  The Supreme Court is the highest appellate court in the United Kingdom, serving as the final arbiter on points of law in civil cases across the UK and criminal cases from England, Wales, and Northern Ireland.
• E. Corte Suprema
  Corte Suprema is the commonly used Spanish name for the Supreme Court of Argentina, the country’s highest judicial authority.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target predicate: heldUnconstitutionalInPartBy
Context triple: [Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985, heldUnconstitutionalInPartBy, Supreme Court of the United States]

• A. declaredUnconstitutionalInCase chosen
  Indicates that a law, policy, or action was ruled unconstitutional in a specific legal case.
• B. overturnedInPartBy
  Indicates that a prior decision, ruling, or outcome has been partially reversed or modified by a later authority or action.
• C. concurrenceInPartAndDissentInPartBy
  Indicates that one party agrees with part of a decision or opinion and disagrees with another part, in relation to another party’s position.
• D. constitutionalBasisOfHolding
  Indicates that one legal holding is grounded in, justified by, or derived from a specific constitutional provision or principle.
• E. yearDeclaredUnconstitutional
  Indicates the specific year in which a law, policy, or legal provision was officially ruled unconstitutional.
• F. None of above.