Triple
T3976114
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Navajo Falls |
E85645
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasSecondaryLanguageOfLocalCommunity |
P9103
|
FINISHED |
| Object | English |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: English | Statement: [Navajo Falls, hasSecondaryLanguageOfLocalCommunity, English]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSecondaryLanguageOfLocalCommunity Context triple: [Navajo Falls, hasSecondaryLanguageOfLocalCommunity, English]
-
A.
hasSecondaryLanguage
chosen
Indicates that an entity possesses or uses a secondary language in addition to its primary language.
-
B.
hasLanguageCommunity
Indicates that an entity is associated with or serves a particular language community.
-
C.
hasSecondaryLanguageTradition
Indicates that an entity possesses an additional, non-primary language tradition associated with it, such as in its use, documentation, or cultural context.
-
D.
secondLanguageSpeakers
Indicates that the referenced language is spoken as a second (non-native) language by the specified group or number of people.
-
E.
ethnicLanguageStatus
Indicates the status or role of a language in relation to a particular ethnic group (e.g., primary, secondary, heritage, or minority language).
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69aed93908348190a26c8aaf4fab3e86 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aefaca33e4819091957c7915857a42 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 4:52 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aef8f252b081909749d40440d372b2 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 4:44 p.m. |
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:33 p.m.