Triple
T3969954
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Article VI of the California Constitution |
E92304
|
entity |
| Predicate | jurisdiction |
P82
|
FINISHED |
| Object | judicial branch of California |
E32683
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: judicial branch of California | Statement: [Article VI of the California Constitution, jurisdiction, judicial branch of California]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: judicial branch of California Context triple: [Article VI of the California Constitution, jurisdiction, judicial branch of California]
-
A.
Judicial Branch of California
chosen
The Judicial Branch of California is the state’s court system responsible for interpreting and applying California law through the Supreme Court, Courts of Appeal, and superior courts.
-
B.
Judicial Council of California
The Judicial Council of California is the policymaking body of the California courts, responsible for setting statewide rules, standards, and administration for the state’s judicial system.
-
C.
Judicial branch of Washington (state)
The Judicial branch of Washington (state) is the system of state courts responsible for interpreting Washington’s laws and constitution, headed by the Washington Supreme Court and including appellate and trial courts.
-
D.
Judicial branch of Michigan
The Judicial branch of Michigan is the state’s court system responsible for interpreting Michigan law, administering justice, and overseeing legal disputes through its hierarchy of trial and appellate courts, including the Michigan Supreme Court.
-
E.
Judicial branch of Texas
The Judicial branch of Texas is the state’s court system responsible for interpreting and applying Texas law, resolving legal disputes, and ensuring justice under the Texas Constitution.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69aed96624188190ac8c45bb57ab72b5 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aef9942c908190aface17a4e8d356d |
completed | March 9, 2026, 4:47 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69b5628ab3ec8190aaaf7803f9f992af |
completed | March 14, 2026, 1:28 p.m. |
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:32 p.m.