Triple
T39536
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Chancellor of the Exchequer |
E782
|
entity |
| Predicate | presents |
P83
|
FINISHED |
| Object | United Kingdom budget |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United Kingdom budget | Statement: [Chancellor of the Exchequer, presents, United Kingdom budget]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: presents Context triple: [Chancellor of the Exchequer, presents, United Kingdom budget]
-
A.
presentedBy
chosen
Indicates that something (such as an event, performance, or work) is formally organized, hosted, or introduced by a particular person or entity.
-
B.
collects
Indicates that one entity gathers, accumulates, or brings together one or more other entities into its possession or control.
-
C.
produces
Indicates that one entity creates, generates, or yields another entity as a result or output.
-
D.
proposes
Indicates that one entity formally suggests or puts forward an idea, plan, or course of action to another entity for consideration or approval.
-
E.
promotes
Indicates that one entity actively supports, advances, or encourages the growth, adoption, or success of another entity or outcome.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a247a8f6c08190bac804906d62ed5a |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a24b80f4a8819090d2bffe29824b90 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:57 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a24ab74c548190a54872e15c8394c3 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:53 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:46 a.m.