Triple
T394782
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | RFC 9114 |
E8958
|
entity |
| Predicate | references |
P771
|
FINISHED |
| Object | RFC 9000 |
E48577
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 9000 | Statement: [RFC 9114, references, RFC 9000]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC 9000 Context triple: [RFC 9114, references, RFC 9000]
-
A.
RFC 9000
chosen
RFC 9000 is the IETF standards document that specifies the QUIC transport protocol, defining its core mechanisms for secure, multiplexed, low-latency communication over UDP.
-
B.
RFC 9001
RFC 9001 is an IETF standard that specifies how the TLS 1.3 protocol is used to secure QUIC connections, defining the cryptographic handshake and key management for QUIC.
-
C.
RFC 9002
RFC 9002 is an IETF standard that specifies the loss detection and congestion control mechanisms for the QUIC transport protocol.
-
D.
RFC 9205
RFC 9205 is an IETF specification that provides guidance and best practices for the use and deployment of HTTP, complementing the core protocol definitions in related HTTP RFCs.
-
E.
RFC 1906
RFC 1906 is an Internet standard that specifies the transport mappings for SNMPv2, detailing how SNMP messages are carried over various network protocols.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e7f55c60819097aff65ea2ca2832 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2ec77a8a08190b6f96373aa8c1346 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:24 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69a41772e19c8190b02a212f13b4d8aa |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:39 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:08 p.m.