Triple

T3914827
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject EC1 Łódź E88809 entity
Predicate hasRenovationPurpose P11548 FINISHED
Object adaptive reuse of industrial heritage LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: adaptive reuse of industrial heritage | Statement: [EC1 Łódź, hasRenovationPurpose, adaptive reuse of industrial heritage]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRenovationPurpose
Context triple: [EC1 Łódź, hasRenovationPurpose, adaptive reuse of industrial heritage]
  • A. hasRenovation
    Indicates that an entity has undergone, is undergoing, or is associated with a renovation process or renovation event.
  • B. renovationPurpose chosen
    Indicates that an entity is being renovated with a specific intended goal, use, or outcome in mind.
  • C. useAfterRenovation
    Indicates that something is intended to be used or occupied only after renovation work has been completed.
  • D. brokeGroundForRenovation
    Indicates that an entity initiated construction work to renovate or significantly upgrade another entity or site.
  • E. renovationFeature
    Indicates that an entity has a specific renovation-related characteristic, element, or improvement associated with it.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69aed955229881909e85e73ffab1d343 completed March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69aef188b474819087680db42b04ecdd completed March 9, 2026, 4:12 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69aee75eedcc81908088ff4dbb8be56b completed March 9, 2026, 3:29 p.m.
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:22 p.m.