Triple

T3913041
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject axiom of choice E87367 entity
Predicate statusInZFC P52531 FINISHED
Object axiom of Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory with choice LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: axiom of Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory with choice | Statement: [axiom of choice, statusInZFC, axiom of Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory with choice]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: statusInZFC
Context triple: [axiom of choice, statusInZFC, axiom of Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory with choice]
  • A. status
    Indicates the current condition, state, or standing of an entity within a given context.
  • B. statusInLogic
    Indicates the logical status or role an entity holds within a formal reasoning or inference context.
  • C. designationStatus
    Indicates the current official classification or standing assigned to an entity within a defined system or process.
  • D. statusIndicates
    Indicates that a particular status value conveys or reflects the current condition, state, or situation of an entity or process.
  • E. deFactoStatus
    Indicates that one entity holds a role, position, or status in practice or by custom, even if it is not formally or legally recognized.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69aed9424514819086e9c58adde6652d completed March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69aef188b474819087680db42b04ecdd completed March 9, 2026, 4:12 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69aee75eedcc81908088ff4dbb8be56b completed March 9, 2026, 3:29 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69aef18748648190b85e62f7796ff4b4 completed March 9, 2026, 4:12 p.m.
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:22 p.m.