Triple

T3903032
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject England’s Debt to India E90539 entity
Predicate hasArgument P52784 FINISHED
Object British rule extracted wealth from India LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: British rule extracted wealth from India | Statement: [England’s Debt to India, hasArgument, British rule extracted wealth from India]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasArgument
Context triple: [England’s Debt to India, hasArgument, British rule extracted wealth from India]
  • A. hasParameter
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific parameter that defines or constrains some aspect of its behavior, configuration, or characteristics.
  • B. hasPar
    Indicates a relationship where one entity has another entity as its parent.
  • C. hasCommand
    Indicates that one entity possesses, controls, or is associated with a specific command or directive applied to another entity or process.
  • D. argumentType
    Indicates that one entity serves as a specific semantic or syntactic argument role (such as subject, object, or complement) in relation to another entity or event.
  • E. hasExpression
    Indicates that an entity displays or possesses a particular facial or emotional expression.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69aed95d315881908cbf1bf4a7215fbf completed March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69aef1abe2dc81909c18aeae9b286898 completed March 9, 2026, 4:13 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69aee75cff148190b6d5979d17fae085 completed March 9, 2026, 3:29 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69aef1aada308190821a3dfa6af170b3 completed March 9, 2026, 4:13 p.m.
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:21 p.m.