Triple
T390249
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Conn Smythe Trophy |
E8863
|
entity |
| Predicate | mostWinsByPlayerCount |
P12883
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 3 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 3 | Statement: [Conn Smythe Trophy, mostWinsByPlayerCount, 3]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mostWinsByPlayerCount Context triple: [Conn Smythe Trophy, mostWinsByPlayerCount, 3]
-
A.
mostOverallWinsHolder
Indicates that the subject is the entity holding the highest total number of wins overall, compared to all other relevant entities.
-
B.
mostOverallWinsRecord
Indicates that the subject holds the record for having the greatest total number of wins compared to all others in the relevant context.
-
C.
winnerCount
Indicates the number of entities that are designated as winners in a given context or event.
-
D.
winnerPlaysIn
Indicates that the entity identified as the winner of a contest or match participates in a subsequent game, round, or event.
-
E.
mainWinner
Indicates that one entity is the primary or overall winner in a competition, contest, or comparative outcome relative to others.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e7f55c60819097aff65ea2ca2832 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2ec5bdc848190826701590070497b |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:23 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2e96960608190bdd342da9c5ddb5e |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:11 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a2ebac09408190be802b96bb203d5f |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:20 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:08 p.m.