Triple

T3897241
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Swiss Armed Forces E90399 entity
Predicate allowsConscientiousObjection P52739 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Swiss Armed Forces, allowsConscientiousObjection, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: allowsConscientiousObjection
Context triple: [Swiss Armed Forces, allowsConscientiousObjection, yes]
  • A. allowedOrdinationOf
    Indicates that one entity permits or authorizes the formal religious ordination of another entity.
  • B. allowsRegulationOf
    Indicates that one entity grants the authority, means, or conditions for another entity to control, manage, or govern something.
  • C. allowsDivorcedRemarriedCommunion
    Indicates that an authority or practice permits individuals who are divorced and remarried to receive communion.
  • D. religiousRestriction
    Indicates that one entity imposes, experiences, or is subject to limitations or rules based on religious beliefs or practices in relation to another entity or context.
  • E. deniesSacramentalStatusOf
    Indicates that one entity asserts another entity does not possess a particular sacramental status or validity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69aed95d315881908cbf1bf4a7215fbf completed March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69aef1abe2dc81909c18aeae9b286898 completed March 9, 2026, 4:13 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69aee75b5b808190a348a31b1325d3d0 completed March 9, 2026, 3:29 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69aef1aada308190821a3dfa6af170b3 completed March 9, 2026, 4:13 p.m.
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:21 p.m.