Triple
T3889558
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tucson, Arizona, United States |
E88025
|
entity |
| Predicate | rankInArizonaByPopulation |
P51671
|
FINISHED |
| Object | second-largest city in Arizona |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: second-largest city in Arizona | Statement: [Tucson, Arizona, United States, rankInArizonaByPopulation, second-largest city in Arizona]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: rankInArizonaByPopulation Context triple: [Tucson, Arizona, United States, rankInArizonaByPopulation, second-largest city in Arizona]
-
A.
rankInCaliforniaByPopulation
Indicates the ordinal position of an entity in a list of California entities ordered by their population size.
-
B.
rankByPopulationInUS
Indicates the relative ordering of entities based on the size of their populations within the United States.
-
C.
rankByPopulationInUnitedStates
Indicates the relative ordering of entities based on their population size within the United States.
-
D.
rankInKansasByPopulation
Indicates the position of an entity in an ordered list of Kansas entities based on their population size.
-
E.
rankByPopulationInColorado
Indicates the relative ordering of entities based on their population size within the state of Colorado.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69aed9466d548190939f5217a23ed4ac |
completed | March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aeecaee7148190ada451ccfc6582ee |
completed | March 9, 2026, 3:52 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aee759609c8190985e96ec6d96dedd |
completed | March 9, 2026, 3:29 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69aee80858a481909961a33fb50ff8d1 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:21 p.m.