Triple

T3877220
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Cayuga E92530 entity
Predicate historicallyEngagedIn P7685 FINISHED
Object Agriculture LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Agriculture | Statement: [Cayuga, historicallyEngagedIn, Agriculture]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: historicallyEngagedIn
Context triple: [Cayuga, historicallyEngagedIn, Agriculture]
  • A. historicallyActiveIn chosen
    Indicates that an entity was active or engaged in significant activities within a particular place or context during a past historical period.
  • B. historicallyResponsibleFor
    Indicates that an entity bears responsibility, typically recognized in historical analysis, for causing, contributing to, or being accountable for a past event, condition, or outcome.
  • C. historicallyAttendedBy
    Indicates that an entity has been attended by another entity at some point in the past, rather than in the present.
  • D. hasHistoricalEvent
    Indicates that a historical event occurred in, is associated with, or is relevant to a particular entity.
  • E. historicallyIn
    Indicates that one entity existed, occurred, or was situated within the historical context, period, or jurisdiction associated with another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69aed967448c819086c4b358d37b25aa completed March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69aef1515c688190a38332aedeed8a76 completed March 9, 2026, 4:12 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69aee7574c408190893e70bf80514838 completed March 9, 2026, 3:29 p.m.
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:20 p.m.