Triple
T3875467
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Vila Nova de Cacela |
E92489
|
entity |
| Predicate | locatedNear |
P294
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Castro Marim |
E12705
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Castro Marim | Statement: [Vila Nova de Cacela, locatedNear, Castro Marim]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Castro Marim Context triple: [Vila Nova de Cacela, locatedNear, Castro Marim]
-
A.
Castro Marim
chosen
Castro Marim is a town and municipality in Portugal’s Algarve region, near the Spanish border, known for its historic castle and salt marshes.
-
B.
Castro Verde
Castro Verde is a rural municipality in Portugal’s Alentejo region, known for its rolling plains, cereal farming, and important birdlife habitats.
-
C.
El Carmen
El Carmen is a town in coastal Ecuador known as an agricultural and commercial center within Manabí Province.
-
D.
Cervera
Cervera is a Spanish surname historically associated with notable figures such as Admiral Pascual Cervera y Topete.
-
E.
Spínola
Spínola is a Portuguese surname most prominently associated with António de Spínola, a key military figure and political leader during Portugal’s Carnation Revolution.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69aed967448c819086c4b358d37b25aa |
completed | March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aeec706434819095e0d2b376adb548 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 3:51 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69b5124f095881909143b624128ff569 |
completed | March 14, 2026, 7:46 a.m. |
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:20 p.m.