Triple
T3874463
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Griswold v. Connecticut |
E92464
|
entity |
| Predicate | statuteChallenged |
P10247
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Connecticut law banning the use of contraceptives |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Connecticut law banning the use of contraceptives | Statement: [Griswold v. Connecticut, statuteChallenged, Connecticut law banning the use of contraceptives]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: statuteChallenged Context triple: [Griswold v. Connecticut, statuteChallenged, Connecticut law banning the use of contraceptives]
-
A.
challengedStatute
chosen
Indicates that a particular statute or law is being contested, questioned, or disputed, typically in a legal or constitutional proceeding.
-
B.
legalDoctrineChallenged
Indicates that a particular legal doctrine is being disputed, questioned, or contested, typically through litigation or formal legal argument.
-
C.
statuteInvolved
Indicates that a particular statute or legal provision is implicated, referenced, or applied in relation to a given case, event, or legal matter.
-
D.
statuteInterpreted
Indicates that a legal authority (such as a court or agency) has provided an interpretation or authoritative reading of a particular statute.
-
E.
precedentChallenged
Indicates that an existing legal precedent is being questioned, disputed, or formally contested.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69aed967448c819086c4b358d37b25aa |
completed | March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aef1515c688190a38332aedeed8a76 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 4:12 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aee7574c408190893e70bf80514838 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 3:29 p.m. |
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:20 p.m.