Triple

T3872593
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject The Gambia v. Myanmar E92421 entity
Predicate hasShortName P1354 FINISHED
Object The Gambia v. Myanmar (ICJ) E92421 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: The Gambia v. Myanmar (ICJ) | Statement: [The Gambia v. Myanmar, hasShortName, The Gambia v. Myanmar (ICJ)]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: The Gambia v. Myanmar (ICJ)
Context triple: [The Gambia v. Myanmar, hasShortName, The Gambia v. Myanmar (ICJ)]
  • A. The Gambia v. Myanmar chosen
    The Gambia v. Myanmar is an ongoing case before the International Court of Justice in which The Gambia accuses Myanmar of violating the Genocide Convention through its treatment of the Rohingya population.
  • B. International Court of Justice advisory opinion on Western Sahara (1975)
    The International Court of Justice advisory opinion on Western Sahara (1975) was a landmark legal ruling that concluded Western Sahara was not terra nullius at the time of Spanish colonization and affirmed the Sahrawi people's right to self-determination.
  • C. International Court of Justice case France v. United Kingdom (1953)
    The International Court of Justice case France v. United Kingdom (1953) was a territorial dispute in which the ICJ adjudicated sovereignty over the Channel Islands groups of Les Écréhous and Minquiers between the two states.
  • D. Namibia Advisory Opinion (Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia)
    The Namibia Advisory Opinion is a 1971 International Court of Justice ruling that declared South Africa’s continued presence in Namibia illegal and clarified the obligations of other states not to recognize or assist that situation.
  • E. Croatia v. Serbia (ICJ, 2015)
    Croatia v. Serbia (ICJ, 2015) is a landmark International Court of Justice case in which the Court adjudicated mutual genocide claims arising from the 1990s Yugoslav wars and clarified key aspects of state responsibility under the Genocide Convention.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69aed967448c819086c4b358d37b25aa completed March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69aeec5691148190b469af0bee9154db completed March 9, 2026, 3:50 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69b51249f1ec8190a1f6cc191bc94421 completed March 14, 2026, 7:46 a.m.
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:20 p.m.