Triple

T38640586
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Real Madrid CF E938581 entity
Predicate hasFormerReserveTeamName P92907 FINISHED
Object Real Madrid Aficionados NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Real Madrid Aficionados | Statement: [Real Madrid CF, hasFormerReserveTeamName, Real Madrid Aficionados]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasFormerReserveTeamName
Context triple: [Real Madrid CF, hasFormerReserveTeamName, Real Madrid Aficionados]
  • A. hasFormerTeam
    Indicates that an entity was previously a member of, played for, or was affiliated with a team in the past but is no longer associated with that team.
  • B. hasFormerClub
    Indicates that an entity (typically a person, such as an athlete) previously belonged to or was a member of a particular club or organization.
  • C. clubFormerName chosen
    Indicates that a sports club previously operated under a different official name.
  • D. predecessorClubNickname
    Indicates that one club’s nickname was previously used by another club that served as its predecessor.
  • E. associatedWithFormerClubName
    Indicates a relationship where an entity is linked to the previous or former name of a club.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76ed948ec81908ce7811608a8f359 completed May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fef8c3f2388190b995ec173512945a completed May 9, 2026, 9:05 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fef65975608190960b78d27e806d4f completed May 9, 2026, 8:54 a.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:32 p.m.