Triple

T38635280
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Microsoft Excel 2003 E937558 entity
Predicate supportsProtection P74614 FINISHED
Object worksheet protection LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: worksheet protection | Statement: [Microsoft Excel 2003, supportsProtection, worksheet protection]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsProtection
Context triple: [Microsoft Excel 2003, supportsProtection, worksheet protection]
  • A. providesProtectionIn chosen
    Indicates that one entity offers protection or safeguarding to another entity within a specified context, location, or situation.
  • B. protects
    Indicates taking action to keep someone or something safe from harm, danger, or negative effects.
  • C. protectedBy
    Indicates that one entity provides protection, defense, or safeguarding for another entity.
  • D. providesProtectionAgainst
    Indicates that one entity serves to guard, shield, or defend another entity from a specified harm, threat, or adverse effect.
  • E. supportsBalanceProtection
    Indicates that an entity provides or enables a balance protection feature that safeguards an account’s or position’s value against certain losses or negative changes.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76ed5ca3c81909288f61fbf37b359 completed May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a037c9141dc819098d7fcc36e69882c completed May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a037a2026248190b894436a578d79ac completed May 12, 2026, 7:06 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:32 p.m.