Triple
T3857413
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Winterpeg |
E90051
|
entity |
| Predicate | describesPropertyOf |
P28215
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Winnipeg climate |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Winnipeg climate | Statement: [Winterpeg, describesPropertyOf, Winnipeg climate]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: describesPropertyOf Context triple: [Winterpeg, describesPropertyOf, Winnipeg climate]
-
A.
identifiesPropertyOf
Indicates that one entity specifies or denotes a particular property or attribute belonging to another entity.
-
B.
metaProperty
chosen
Indicates that one property functions as a higher-level descriptor or attribute about another property, rather than about an entity directly.
-
C.
describedIn
Indicates that information about an entity is contained or documented within a specified source, such as a text, document, or media.
-
D.
recognizedFormOfProperty
Indicates that one entity is acknowledged or accepted as a valid or official form, variant, or representation of a particular property associated with another entity.
-
E.
describes
Indicates that one entity provides an explanation, representation, or account of another entity or concept.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69aed95b3c088190a8f85d19e6070599 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aeec09312c81908ffd7441c83730c8 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aee752c8a48190a670f73ed0bf1e61 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 3:29 p.m. |
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:19 p.m.