Triple

T38522265
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lucille Cameron E922513 entity
Predicate hasSpouseLegalIssues P55300 FINISHED
Object Jack Johnson’s prosecution under the Mann Act LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Jack Johnson’s prosecution under the Mann Act | Statement: [Lucille Cameron, hasSpouseLegalIssues, Jack Johnson’s prosecution under the Mann Act]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSpouseLegalIssues
Context triple: [Lucille Cameron, hasSpouseLegalIssues, Jack Johnson’s prosecution under the Mann Act]
  • A. hasSpouseOrPartnerInLegalCaseWith
    Indicates that two individuals are spouses or partners who are jointly involved in the same legal case.
  • B. spouseInvolvedIn chosen
    Indicates that a person's spouse participates in, is associated with, or plays a role in a specified activity, event, or situation.
  • C. hasVictimSpouse
    Indicates that a person’s spouse is the victim in a harmful, criminal, or adverse event involving that person.
  • D. maritalIssue
    Indicates a relationship where there is conflict, dissatisfaction, or significant strain within a marital or committed partnership.
  • E. spouseRepresented
    Indicates that one person served as the legal or official representative (e.g., agent, attorney, or proxy) of their spouse in some formal capacity or proceeding.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76ea5f5588190bd0b28c82e975640 completed May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ff2636e2bc8190bba91eff91431c6e completed May 9, 2026, 12:19 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ff25c65be48190868480d94e1c4e89 completed May 9, 2026, 12:17 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:32 p.m.