Triple
T38499804
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Legislative Council (India) |
E919795
|
entity |
| Predicate | votingRightOnMoneyBills |
P20694
|
FINISHED |
| Object | no power to amend money bills |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: no power to amend money bills | Statement: [Legislative Council (India), votingRightOnMoneyBills, no power to amend money bills]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: votingRightOnMoneyBills Context triple: [Legislative Council (India), votingRightOnMoneyBills, no power to amend money bills]
-
A.
passesBillsBy
Indicates that one entity successfully approves or enacts bills or legislation through the actions or decisions of another entity.
-
B.
powerOverMoneyBills
chosen
Indicates having control or authority over the handling, allocation, or management of money bills.
-
C.
canHoldVotesOfNoConfidenceIn
Indicates that one entity has the authority or power to initiate or conduct votes of no confidence regarding another entity.
-
D.
passesBillsTo
Indicates that one entity formally transfers or submits bills or proposed legislation to another entity for consideration or action.
-
E.
canAmendBills
Indicates that an entity has the authority or ability to modify, revise, or propose changes to bills.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e9ddd4481908f8c04439d848f9d |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fce28d6c3081908bf76f5db63ecf68 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fce12d2f08819082134b5eb3db6a24 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 6:59 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:31 p.m.