Triple

T38422633
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject I, Robot (short story) E903272 entity
Predicate authorCollectivePseudonymFor P197314 FINISHED
Object Earl Binder NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Earl Binder | Statement: [I, Robot (short story), authorCollectivePseudonymFor, Earl Binder]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: authorCollectivePseudonymFor
Context triple: [I, Robot (short story), authorCollectivePseudonymFor, Earl Binder]
  • A. authorCollective
    Indicates that a work is created or authored by a collective group rather than by an individual.
  • B. pseudonymCoinedBy
    Indicates that a particular pseudonym was created or invented by a specific agent or source.
  • C. coAppearsWithPseudonym
    Indicates that an entity appears together with another entity that is identified or referenced by a pseudonym in the same context or source.
  • D. authorOfNamesFor
    Indicates that one entity is the creator or originator of the names assigned to another entity or set of entities.
  • E. pseudonymOfArtist
    Indicates that one name is a pseudonym used by an artist as an alternative to their real or primary name.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e67e4fc8190a7d08dfe9a8af998 completed May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fe86cad5108190b0164b8bc6fc23ea completed May 9, 2026, 12:58 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fe83c0c9888190b6fc40c7f727b569 completed May 9, 2026, 12:45 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fe86c98d688190a99d5dcb14e2dc95 completed May 9, 2026, 12:58 a.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:31 p.m.