Triple
T38418053
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tat-Southern |
E903153
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Tat language variety |
C29124
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Tat language variety Context triple: [Tat-Southern, instanceOf, Tat language variety]
-
A.
variety of Tat language
chosen
A variety of Tat language is a distinct regional or social form of the Tat language characterized by unique phonological, lexical, and grammatical features within the broader Tat-speaking community.
-
B.
Luri language variety
A Luri language variety is a specific regional or social form of the Luri language, distinguished by its own characteristic phonological, lexical, and grammatical features within the broader continuum of Southwestern Iranian dialects.
-
C.
Yana language variety
Yana language variety refers to any of the related but distinct forms of the Yana language traditionally spoken by the Yana people of northern California, encompassing dialectal differences in phonology, vocabulary, and grammar.
-
D.
Rarámuri language variety
A Rarámuri language variety is a specific regional or social form of the Rarámuri (Tarahumara) language, distinguished by its unique phonological, lexical, and grammatical features within the broader Rarámuri linguistic continuum.
-
E.
Dargwa language variety
A Dargwa language variety is a specific regional or social form of the Dargwa language, characterized by distinct phonological, lexical, and grammatical features within the broader Dargwa linguistic continuum.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e67e4fc8190a7d08dfe9a8af998 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:31 p.m.