Triple
T38418027
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Shamakhi Tat |
E903152
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | regional variety of Southern Tat |
C29124
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: regional variety of Southern Tat Context triple: [Shamakhi Tat, instanceOf, regional variety of Southern Tat]
-
A.
variety of Tat language
chosen
A variety of Tat language is a distinct regional or social form of the Tat language characterized by unique phonological, lexical, and grammatical features within the broader Tat-speaking community.
-
B.
regional variety of Choctaw
A regional variety of Choctaw is a geographically distinct form of the Choctaw language characterized by unique phonological, lexical, and grammatical features shared by speakers in a particular area.
-
C.
regional variety of Ghomalaʼ
A regional variety of Ghomalaʼ is a geographically localized dialect of the Ghomalaʼ language characterized by distinct phonological, lexical, or syntactic features specific to a particular area or community.
-
D.
Thaua language variety
Thaua language variety refers to a specific regional or dialectal form of the Thaua language, characterized by its own distinctive phonological, lexical, and grammatical features within the broader Thaua linguistic tradition.
-
E.
regional variety of Toraja-Saʼdan
A regional variety of Toraja-Saʼdan is a geographically distinct form of the Toraja-Saʼdan language characterized by unique phonological, lexical, and grammatical features specific to a particular area or community.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e67e4fc8190a7d08dfe9a8af998 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:31 p.m.