Triple
T38411624
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | PEP 604 |
E901490
|
entity |
| Predicate | replacesSyntax |
P197917
|
FINISHED |
| Object | typing.Union[X, Y] with X | Y |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: typing.Union[X, Y] with X | Y | Statement: [PEP 604, replacesSyntax, typing.Union[X, Y] with X | Y]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: replacesSyntax Context triple: [PEP 604, replacesSyntax, typing.Union[X, Y] with X | Y]
-
A.
definesSyntax
Indicates that one entity specifies or determines the formal structure, rules, or grammar by which another entity is expressed or interpreted.
-
B.
replacesSupportFor
Indicates that one entity takes over or substitutes for the role or function previously provided by another entity’s support.
-
C.
replacesInPractice
Indicates that one entity has effectively taken over the role, function, or use of another entity in real-world application or usage.
-
D.
replacesWord
Indicates that one word is substituted for another word in a given context or expression.
-
E.
replacedWith
Indicates that one entity has been substituted or superseded by another entity, taking over its role, function, or position.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e61e79c81908b787d83b46ab92b |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69feb8e856d48190aa34ad8ee8376e1c |
completed | May 9, 2026, 4:32 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69feb82a2b6c8190a473cc25976897be |
completed | May 9, 2026, 4:29 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69feb8e6ed7881908446745c89c30784 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 4:32 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:31 p.m.