Triple
T3833535
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | VX |
E91072
|
entity |
| Predicate | solubilityInOrganicSolvents |
P34779
|
FINISHED |
| Object | high |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: high | Statement: [VX, solubilityInOrganicSolvents, high]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: solubilityInOrganicSolvents Context triple: [VX, solubilityInOrganicSolvents, high]
-
A.
isHydrophobic
Indicates that one entity has a tendency to repel or avoid interaction with water or aqueous environments.
-
B.
canBeDissolvedWith
chosen
Indicates that one entity is capable of being dissolved or broken down when exposed to another specified substance or medium.
-
C.
predominantOxidationStateInSolution
Indicates the oxidation state that a chemical species most commonly or primarily adopts when present in a given solution.
-
D.
formulatedIn
Indicates that something was created, developed, or expressed within a particular context, place, or framework.
-
E.
secondaryOxidationStateInSolution
Indicates the oxidation state an element or species commonly adopts as a secondary (non-primary) state when dissolved in a given solution.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69aed960b538819096561c8ed448dec9 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aeeb88b8a8819082d4bdbc5bc45366 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aee74c2e04819094b94b3c0bac1806 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 3:29 p.m. |
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:17 p.m.