Triple

T3831990
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject L200 E91033 entity
Predicate hasFeatureLevel P2393 FINISHED
Object mid-range equipment LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: mid-range equipment | Statement: [L200, hasFeatureLevel, mid-range equipment]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasFeatureLevel
Context triple: [L200, hasFeatureLevel, mid-range equipment]
  • A. hasFeature
    Indicates that an entity possesses, exhibits, or includes a particular characteristic, attribute, or component.
  • B. hasFeatureCode
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific feature identifier or code that characterizes one of its properties or attributes.
  • C. hasLevel chosen
    Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a particular degree, rank, or stage within an ordered scale or hierarchy.
  • D. featureLevelComparedTo
    Indicates a comparative relationship between entities based on their feature level, specifying how one entity’s feature level ranks relative to another’s.
  • E. hasSupported
    Indicates that one entity has provided assistance, endorsement, or backing to another entity, either materially, emotionally, or through advocacy.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69aed960b538819096561c8ed448dec9 completed March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69aeeb8787bc8190819a7af975b609df completed March 9, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69aee74c2e04819094b94b3c0bac1806 completed March 9, 2026, 3:29 p.m.
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:17 p.m.