Triple

T3830361
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Grutter v. Bollinger E90995 entity
Predicate fullName P16 FINISHED
Object Grutter v. Bollinger E90995 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Grutter v. Bollinger | Statement: [Grutter v. Bollinger, fullName, Grutter v. Bollinger]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Grutter v. Bollinger
Context triple: [Grutter v. Bollinger, fullName, Grutter v. Bollinger]
  • A. Grutter v. Bollinger chosen
    Grutter v. Bollinger is a landmark 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the limited use of race as one factor in holistic law school admissions to promote educational diversity.
  • B. Gratz v. Bollinger
    Gratz v. Bollinger is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the University of Michigan’s undergraduate affirmative action admissions policy as violating the Equal Protection Clause by awarding automatic points based on race.
  • C. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
    Regents of the University of California v. Bakke is a landmark 1978 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down rigid racial quotas in university admissions while upholding the constitutionality of using race as one factor among many to foster diversity.
  • D. Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College
    Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College is a landmark 2023 U.S. Supreme Court case that sharply limited the use of race-conscious admissions policies in higher education, effectively ending affirmative action programs at colleges and universities nationwide.
  • E. Lee v. Weisman
    Lee v. Weisman is a 1992 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held clergy-led prayer at public school graduation ceremonies unconstitutional under the Establishment Clause.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69aed960b538819096561c8ed448dec9 completed March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69aeeb8459f881908a2c91bb07e381ef completed March 9, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69b512259d048190be25add7e38a0326 completed March 14, 2026, 7:45 a.m.
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:17 p.m.