Triple
T38296240
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hidalgo Teenek |
E1022493
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | regional variety of Teenek |
C66303
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: regional variety of Teenek Context triple: [Hidalgo Teenek, instanceOf, regional variety of Teenek]
-
A.
regional variety of Ghomalaʼ
A regional variety of Ghomalaʼ is a geographically localized dialect of the Ghomalaʼ language characterized by distinct phonological, lexical, or syntactic features specific to a particular area or community.
-
B.
regional variety of Koyra Chiini
A regional variety of Koyra Chiini is a geographically localized form of the Koyra Chiini language characterized by distinct phonological, lexical, or grammatical features specific to a particular area or community.
-
C.
Thaua language variety
Thaua language variety refers to a specific regional or dialectal form of the Thaua language, characterized by its own distinctive phonological, lexical, and grammatical features within the broader Thaua linguistic tradition.
-
D.
Tugen dialect
Tugen dialect is a regional variety of the Kalenjin language spoken by the Tugen people of Kenya, characterized by distinct phonological, lexical, and grammatical features within the Kalenjin dialect continuum.
-
E.
Rarámuri language variety
A Rarámuri language variety is a specific regional or social form of the Rarámuri (Tarahumara) language, distinguished by its unique phonological, lexical, and grammatical features within the broader Rarámuri linguistic continuum.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76df190f081908d5aa02c8a9286d0 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:30 p.m.