Triple
T38225137
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Midas touch |
E1012120
|
entity |
| Predicate | canAlsoImply |
P37164
|
FINISHED |
| Object | supernatural-seeming luck |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: supernatural-seeming luck | Statement: [Midas touch, canAlsoImply, supernatural-seeming luck]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canAlsoImply Context triple: [Midas touch, canAlsoImply, supernatural-seeming luck]
-
A.
canAlsoBe
Indicates that something has an additional possible state, role, or classification beyond its primary one.
-
B.
canAlsoIndicate
chosen
Indicates that something may additionally signify, represent, or serve as another meaning or function beyond its primary one.
-
C.
hasImplicationsFor
Indicates that one entity’s state, action, or condition leads to consequences, effects, or relevance for another entity.
-
D.
implies
Indicates that the truth of one statement guarantees or leads logically to the truth of another statement.
-
E.
canBe
Indicates that one entity has the potential, permission, or capability to become, perform as, or be classified as another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76dd25e0c81909f2abd0803e5e3ee |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fcc42cbac48190b8d3e4c9ce140838 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 4:56 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fcb0fc69c88190800453eb57a7e62c |
completed | May 7, 2026, 3:34 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:30 p.m.