Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Agency for International Development v. Alliance for Open Society International, Inc. | Statement: [October Term 2012, includesCase, Agency for International Development v. Alliance for Open Society International, Inc.]

Target entity: Agency for International Development v. Alliance for Open Society International, Inc.
Context triple: [October Term 2012, includesCase, Agency for International Development v. Alliance for Open Society International, Inc.]

• A. Clapper v. Amnesty International USA
  Clapper v. Amnesty International USA is a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed whether plaintiffs had standing to challenge the constitutionality of government surveillance conducted under the FISA Amendments Act.
• B. Chiafalo v. Washington
  Chiafalo v. Washington is a 2020 U.S. Supreme Court case that unanimously upheld states’ authority to penalize or replace “faithless electors” who do not vote in line with their state’s popular vote in presidential elections.
• C. County of Allegheny v. ACLU
  County of Allegheny v. ACLU is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that refined the interpretation of the Establishment Clause by addressing the constitutionality of religious holiday displays on government property.
• D. Alexander v. Sandoval
  Alexander v. Sandoval is a 2001 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held there is no private right of action to enforce disparate-impact regulations under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
• E. United States v. Donovan
  United States v. Donovan is a U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the requirements and scope of federal wiretap procedures and notice obligations under Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"

Entity: Agency for International Development v. Alliance for Open Society International, Inc.
Triple: [October Term 2012, includesCase, Agency for International Development v. Alliance for Open Society International, Inc.]

Agency for International Development v. Alliance for Open Society International, Inc. is a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the government cannot require organizations receiving federal funds to adopt a specific ideological position as a condition of funding, under the First Amendment.

Target entity: Agency for International Development v. Alliance for Open Society International, Inc.
Target entity description: Agency for International Development v. Alliance for Open Society International, Inc. is a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the government cannot require organizations receiving federal funds to adopt a specific ideological position as a condition of funding, under the First Amendment.

• A. Clapper v. Amnesty International USA
  Clapper v. Amnesty International USA is a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed whether plaintiffs had standing to challenge the constitutionality of government surveillance conducted under the FISA Amendments Act.
• B. Chiafalo v. Washington
  Chiafalo v. Washington is a 2020 U.S. Supreme Court case that unanimously upheld states’ authority to penalize or replace “faithless electors” who do not vote in line with their state’s popular vote in presidential elections.
• C. County of Allegheny v. ACLU
  County of Allegheny v. ACLU is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that refined the interpretation of the Establishment Clause by addressing the constitutionality of religious holiday displays on government property.
• D. Alexander v. Sandoval
  Alexander v. Sandoval is a 2001 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held there is no private right of action to enforce disparate-impact regulations under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
• E. United States v. Donovan
  United States v. Donovan is a U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the requirements and scope of federal wiretap procedures and notice obligations under Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968.
• F. None of above. chosen