Triple
T3821739
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tucker Act jurisdiction |
E88587
|
entity |
| Predicate | alsoKnownAs |
P39
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Little Tucker Act jurisdiction |
E88587
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Little Tucker Act jurisdiction | Statement: [Tucker Act jurisdiction, alsoKnownAs, Little Tucker Act jurisdiction]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Little Tucker Act jurisdiction Context triple: [Tucker Act jurisdiction, alsoKnownAs, Little Tucker Act jurisdiction]
-
A.
Tucker Act jurisdiction
chosen
Tucker Act jurisdiction refers to the authority of certain federal courts to hear monetary claims against the United States government based on contracts, statutes, regulations, or the Constitution.
-
B.
Michigan v. Tucker
Michigan v. Tucker is a 1974 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited the exclusionary rule’s application to statements obtained without full Miranda warnings, holding that derivative evidence from such statements could still be admissible.
-
C.
Ex parte Young
Ex parte Young is a landmark 1908 U.S. Supreme Court decision that created a legal fiction allowing suits in federal court against state officials to stop ongoing violations of federal law, despite state sovereign immunity under the Eleventh Amendment.
-
D.
small claims division
The small claims division is a specialized court department that handles minor civil disputes involving limited monetary amounts through simplified, informal procedures without requiring attorneys.
-
E.
Act on General Rules for Application of Laws
The Act on General Rules for Application of Laws is a Japanese statute that sets out fundamental principles for how laws are interpreted, applied, and coordinated within Japan’s legal system.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69aed9538cf881909d9ce8ca4ac7c18c |
completed | March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aeea62cdfc81909a3bf458b73d60e7 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 3:42 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69b4fb4998248190b4174dd80a8e790c |
completed | March 14, 2026, 6:08 a.m. |
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:17 p.m.