Triple

T38209465
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lewis Hubert Lasseter E1009297 entity
Predicate allegedDiscoveryLocation P3985 FINISHED
Object central Australian desert LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: central Australian desert | Statement: [Lewis Hubert Lasseter, allegedDiscoveryLocation, central Australian desert]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: allegedDiscoveryLocation
Context triple: [Lewis Hubert Lasseter, allegedDiscoveryLocation, central Australian desert]
  • A. allegedSupportLocation
    Indicates a claimed or reported place where support (such as assistance, resources, or backing) is said to have been provided or received.
  • B. locatedAtTimeOfDiscovery
    Indicates the place where something was situated at the moment it was first discovered.
  • C. wasDiscoveredAt chosen
    Indicates that an entity was found, identified, or uncovered at a specific place or during a particular event or context.
  • D. discoveredWith
    Indicates that one entity was found, detected, or identified using another entity as the means, tool, method, or accompanying context of discovery.
  • E. unveiledLocation
    Indicates that an entity has revealed or made known the location of another entity or object.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76dc94fcc8190bd2f55e81f9d6527 completed May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fcf1b3d9a08190850b388308656266 completed May 7, 2026, 8:10 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fcf0226d8c8190b23dceafb1794995 completed May 7, 2026, 8:03 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:30 p.m.