Triple
T3818029
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Anita Bose Pfaff |
E84302
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasAdvocated |
P33
|
FINISHED |
| Object | DNA testing of ashes at Renkoji Temple |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: DNA testing of ashes at Renkoji Temple | Statement: [Anita Bose Pfaff, hasAdvocated, DNA testing of ashes at Renkoji Temple]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAdvocated Context triple: [Anita Bose Pfaff, hasAdvocated, DNA testing of ashes at Renkoji Temple]
-
A.
hasAdvocacyMethod
Indicates the method, strategy, or approach used to advocate for a cause, issue, or entity.
-
B.
advocates
chosen
Indicates that one entity publicly supports, recommends, or argues in favor of another entity or its interests.
-
C.
hasCounsel
Indicates that one entity serves as a legal advisor or representative (counsel) for another entity.
-
D.
hasAppealsTo
Indicates that one entity formally challenges or seeks review of a decision, judgment, or outcome through another entity or process.
-
E.
hadVoteIn
Indicates that an entity participated by casting a vote in a particular decision, election, or voting event.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69aed931f5908190be2c07af66d4df25 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aef188b474819087680db42b04ecdd |
completed | March 9, 2026, 4:12 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aee74a2bc081909b237df8b1e27653 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 3:29 p.m. |
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:17 p.m.