Triple

T38130295
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Clovis II E952199 entity
Predicate predecessorInBurgundy P197313 FINISHED
Object Dagobert I NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Dagobert I | Statement: [Clovis II, predecessorInBurgundy, Dagobert I]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: predecessorInBurgundy
Context triple: [Clovis II, predecessorInBurgundy, Dagobert I]
  • A. predecessorAsKingOfBurgundy
    Indicates that one entity served as the immediately preceding king of Burgundy to the other entity.
  • B. predecessorAsDukeOfBrittany
    Indicates that one entity previously held the title of Duke of Brittany immediately before another entity.
  • C. predecessorAsDukeOfAnjou
    Indicates that one entity previously held the title of Duke of Anjou before another entity, serving as that entity’s immediate predecessor in this ducal role.
  • D. predecessorAsDukeOfOrléans
    Indicates that one entity previously held the title of Duke of Orléans immediately before another entity, serving as that successor’s direct predecessor in the dukedom.
  • E. predecessorAsDauphin
    Indicates that one entity previously held the title or role of Dauphin immediately before another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76f083548819082bd2bbf53c79e8e completed May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fe86cad5108190b0164b8bc6fc23ea completed May 9, 2026, 12:58 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fe83c0c9888190b6fc40c7f727b569 completed May 9, 2026, 12:45 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fe86c98d688190a99d5dcb14e2dc95 completed May 9, 2026, 12:58 a.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:21 p.m.