Triple
T38112673
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Decree No. 2 on detention without trial |
E951696
|
entity |
| Predicate | relationToRuleOfLaw |
P142158
|
FINISHED |
| Object | undermined rule of law in Nigeria |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: undermined rule of law in Nigeria | Statement: [Decree No. 2 on detention without trial, relationToRuleOfLaw, undermined rule of law in Nigeria]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationToRuleOfLaw Context triple: [Decree No. 2 on detention without trial, relationToRuleOfLaw, undermined rule of law in Nigeria]
-
A.
relationshipToTribalLaw
Indicates that one entity has a specified legal or regulatory connection, status, or relevance with respect to tribal law.
-
B.
hasRelationshipToLaw
chosen
Indicates that one entity has a defined connection, relevance, or applicability to a specific law or legal framework.
-
C.
relatedLegalSystem
Indicates that there is an association or connection between two legal systems, such as influence, similarity, shared origin, or mutual relevance.
-
D.
relationToTheIndependent
Indicates a relationship in which one entity is connected or relevant to another entity that is designated as independent.
-
E.
relatedLegalConcept
Indicates that one legal concept is connected or associated with another through a relevant legal relationship or context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76f065ed08190bdfb1b6d817f5b39 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a037df1223c8190a5d61e4f8e6fd613 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:22 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a037a1ad6c48190bfe35d350c1b4751 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:06 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:21 p.m.