Triple
T38028449
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Spanish Missouri |
E948841
|
entity |
| Predicate | subsequentTransferTreaty |
P7978
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Louisiana Purchase |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Louisiana Purchase | Statement: [Spanish Missouri, subsequentTransferTreaty, Louisiana Purchase]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: subsequentTransferTreaty Context triple: [Spanish Missouri, subsequentTransferTreaty, Louisiana Purchase]
-
A.
treatyAfter
Indicates that a treaty or formal agreement was established after a specified prior event, condition, or relationship between the entities.
-
B.
treatyLeadingToSuccession
Indicates that a treaty or formal agreement results in or establishes the succession of authority, rights, or control from one party to another.
-
C.
followedTreaty
Indicates that one party complied with and acted in accordance with the terms of a specified treaty in relation to another party.
-
D.
subsequentAgreement
Indicates that a later agreement or understanding was reached that follows and potentially modifies or supplements an earlier one.
-
E.
cededByTreaty
chosen
Indicates that control or ownership of one entity was formally transferred to another entity as a result of a treaty or formal agreement.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76efd1bc48190a729097fe5177b61 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fc4748843c8190931432653be4890c |
completed | May 7, 2026, 8:03 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fc45646ce481908caf292ff9f06e15 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 7:55 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:20 p.m.