Triple

T37974342
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Finding Everett Ruess E947379 entity
Predicate investigatesEvent P16515 FINISHED
Object 1934 disappearance of Everett Ruess NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1934 disappearance of Everett Ruess | Statement: [Finding Everett Ruess, investigatesEvent, 1934 disappearance of Everett Ruess]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: investigatesEvent
Context triple: [Finding Everett Ruess, investigatesEvent, 1934 disappearance of Everett Ruess]
  • A. investigatedEvent chosen
    Indicates that an event was the subject of an investigation or inquiry carried out by some agent.
  • B. eventIn
    Indicates that an event occurs within, or is situated in, a specific location, context, or larger event.
  • C. investigatesIn
    Indicates that an entity conducts an investigation or inquiry within, or focused on, a particular context, location, or domain.
  • D. investigatesAt
    Indicates that an entity conducts an investigation or research activity at a specific location or institution.
  • E. investigatedBy
    Indicates that an entity is the subject of an investigation carried out by another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76ef7db908190bba6086673a32300 completed May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fbc7b78f9481909f4f8fc2e3fdcde1 completed May 6, 2026, 10:59 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fbbd18c9908190928d274f8731dfa8 completed May 6, 2026, 10:13 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:20 p.m.