Triple
T37966077
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cumberland County |
E947145
|
entity |
| Predicate | historicLieutenancy |
P53024
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Lord Lieutenant of Cumberland |
E331827
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lord Lieutenant of Cumberland | Statement: [Cumberland County, historicLieutenancy, Lord Lieutenant of Cumberland]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: historicLieutenancy Context triple: [Cumberland County, historicLieutenancy, Lord Lieutenant of Cumberland]
-
A.
historicLieutenancyArea
chosen
Indicates that an entity is located within or associated with a historic lieutenancy area (a former ceremonial or administrative jurisdiction under a lord-lieutenant).
-
B.
historicBarony
Indicates that an entity has the status or role of a historic barony, i.e., it was once recognized as a baronial territorial or feudal jurisdiction.
-
C.
historicParliamentaryCounty
Indicates that an entity is (or was) located within, or associated with, a historic parliamentary county as defined for electoral or administrative purposes.
-
D.
historicCountyPart
Indicates that one entity forms a constituent part or subdivision of a historic county.
-
E.
historicAdministrativeUnit
Indicates that an entity functioned as an official administrative unit or division during a past or no-longer-current historical period.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76ef7062c819091bfacb7e83aa1e0 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a01ccd995e48190b6675e463bd0a567 |
completed | May 11, 2026, 12:34 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a41180ace8c8190bcf8f98479c761a7 |
completed | June 28, 2026, 12:48 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a01cc33177c8190bc0703276618b3ec |
completed | May 11, 2026, 12:31 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:20 p.m.